NOTE: I found this video on YouTube. It fits. However, I recommend you watch it without clicking through to ejb. :)
So we’ve been taken for a ride by the US automakers and now the government will come to the rescue, eh? Think again.
The Commander in Chief of the United States armed forces now runs General Motors. Oh, no.
Today, he declared (via the NYT):
I am announcing that my administration will offer G.M. and Chrysler a limited period of time to work with creditors, unions and other stakeholders to fundamentally restructure in a way that would justify an investment of additional tax dollars; a period during which they must produce plans that would give the American people confidence in their long-term prospects for success.
This destruction of value is pathetic, futile, and disconcerting. It’s bad morality, ethics, and economics. I’m not sticking up for the ousted CEO. It’s just crazy to put the federal government in charge of these decisions. In addition, this firing is mere PR, a misdirection.
The article continues:
The president said he was designating Edward Montgomery, a former deputy labor secretary, to oversee the auto-recovery effort. His mission will be far-reaching, to cut through government red tape and identify initiatives to support those communities hit hard by the industry’s troubles.
“A former deputy labor secretary?!” Ha! That’s rich.
“To cut through red tape and identify initiatives to support those communities hit hard…” — Yes, because deputy labor secretaries are well known for cutting red tape. Ge-ni-us. And of course playing this PR game requires conspicuous compassion (so-called) so there must be some appearance of empathy, of concern for community pain, even as government intrusion deepens the problems.
It gets even crazier:
Other salient features of the latest plan to pull Detroit out of its decades-long skid include a tax break, being started by the Internal Revenue Service at once, for auto purchases made from Feb. 16 and the end of 2009; incentives for people to turn in older, less fuel-efficient vehicles and buy more energy-efficient cars and government-backed warrants to assure customers that they have nothing to fear by buying a car from G.M. or Chrysler.
While the president’s announcement embodies firm government control of the car industry, at least for now, he said, “These companies — and this industry — must ultimately stand on their own, not as wards of the state.”
The concept of encouraging people to buy more fuel-efficient cars, which has been tried with considerable success in Europe, will require the cooperation of Congress. Mr. Obama said he would work with lawmakers to identify portions of the recently enacted multibillion-dollar stimulus package that could be trimmed to finance the purchase-incentive idea — and make it effective at once.
Can anyone say “Protectionism?” Great move, Mr. President. Let’s start another round of trade battling.
Reactively borrowing from their nightmare stimulus (so-called) package to fund (so-called) this affront via tax incentives aka laundered bribes, these robber-baron bureaucrats can load up as many kickbacks as they want. Regardless, I am not buying a car from this mess.
What about the elephant in the boardroom, i.e. union costs? I guess the elephant’s on a break.
Although some observers of the auto industry have attributed Detroit’s troubles in part to generous wages and health benefits for assembly line workers, the president made no mention of those factors. Rather, he said, there has been a failure of leadership.
A failure of leadership, indeed.
In case you thought backstopping the entire financial system wasn’t enough of a burden for private American wealth to bear, now you can add automaker liabilities as well:
The plan Mr. Obama announced on Monday includes government backing of warranties for G.M. and Chrysler cars and trucks, to give consumers enough confidence to buy them, even if one or both are forced into bankruptcy.
What builds trust? What destroys it? Does this move inspire “confidence?” Puh-lease. Today’s announcement is simultaneously pro labor, protectionist, and tax increasing. Trifecta!
Of course, perhaps soon the Commander in Chief will mandate that, under penalty of wage garnishment for non-compliance, all American citizens must buy a new car every five years from either GM or Chrysler. If you consider that an absurd suggestion, you aren’t paying attention to the removal of liberties and free enterprise.
Look also at the bills and debts these leaders (so-called) are piling up with your name on them. This and worse is being done to you and me every week.
Peer through the PR veneer to see the substance of these actions.
We are being run over by the President, Congress, and The Fed.