The WSJ reported on February 27 that “US To Take Big Citi Stake and Overhaul the Board:”
As a condition, the government is demanding that the New York company overhaul its board of directors, the people said. Treasury will call for Citigroup’s board to be comprised of a majority of independent directors. Chief Executive Vikram Pandit is expected to keep his job under the agreement.
The government will convert its stake only to the extent that Citigroup can persuade private investors such as sovereign wealth funds do so as well, the people said. The Treasury will match private investors’ conversions dollar-for-dollar up to $25 billion.
The size of the government’s new stake will hinge on how many preferred shares private investors agree to convert into common stock. The Treasury’s stake is expected to rise to up to 40% of Citigroup, the people said.
An agreement would mark the third time since October that Washington has come to Citigroup’s rescue. Twice last fall, the government pumped a total of $45 billion into the company, and also agreed to protect Citigroup against most losses on $301 billion of assets. That gave the U.S. a 7.8% stake in the company.
The WSJ reported on February 25 that “Bernanke Again Pushes Back Against Nationalization:”
In response to a specific question about Citigroup Inc.’s current woes, Mr. Bernanke told the House Financial Services Committee, “We will see how their test works out and we’ll see what evolves.” Nationalization, he said, misses the point.
Asked if the Citigroup could end up nationalized, Mr. Bernanke said he doesn’t see that happening. “It may be the case that the government will have a substantial minority share in Citi or other banks, but again we have the tools… to make sure that we get the good results we want in terms of improved performance” without the negative effects of a bankruptcy process or seizure, which would be disruptive to the markets, Bernanke said.
He added that he defines nationalization as the government taking over 100% of a firm and zeroing out stock. “I don’t think we want to do that,” he said. “I don’t think we need to do that.”
So, it’s not “nationalization” according to the Fed Chairman unless one government controls the entire 100%? How convenient.
The US will match other sovereign wealth funds dollar for dollar to acquire up to a 40% stake in Citigroup for the Feds. Call it what you will, e.g. call it “Unicornization,” but Citigroup is a private organization no more. It’s been nationalized.
President Obama lies to our faces about earmarks with easy self-confidence. His Fed Chairman follows his lead to openly proclaim with confident detachment utter nonsense.
Do you trust these people? If so, why? Without question, they are lying constantly. You cannot believe the words. That’s not possible if you are honest.
Despite the lies, do you believe in the goodness of the intent behind the lies — that these leaders, so-called, are deceiving us with a wink and for our own good? Is that your view? Have you even thought about it? Or are you also complicit in all this dishonesty by actively deluding yourself?
On a related note — do you believe the dollars in your pocket? If so, why?
Have you ever bought a gold coin? Have you held a bar of silver? I relive my first experience each time I acquire more. Holding these items always strikes me as an odd thing. What is different? Why do these objects seem special? What is this feeling?
Oh. This is money.
The other junk we keep in our pockets represents the lies of our leaders rendered into print in such a manner that we can all participate in the delusion. For Americans, it’s been a wonderful setup for decades because the whole system is so ruthlessly rigged in favor of the US dollar. What happens if this massive shared dream ends?
What if the ideas of the Austrian school of economics are correct? If so, what happens next?
What builds trust? What destroys it? What store of value is safe?