“I expect there will be some failures” of smaller banks. “Among the largest banks, the capital ratios remain good and I don’t anticipate any serious problems of that sort among the large, internationally active banks that make up a very substantial part of our banking system.”
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, February 2008
Was the Fed Chairman lying or just totally wrong? In either case, should we make the financial system yet more fragile and inflexible by adding to the immense power held by this position?
Btw, have you noticed how often commentators mention that Bernanke is an “expert” on the Great Depression? If I had a dollar for every time I’ve heard that bit, I’d exchange all that paper for gold.
Do we not con ourselves with such talk? It is naturally somehow comforting to believe that our problems will lessen or disappear because some single expert can devise the solution to save us. As with all myths, though, reality differs from the tale.
While it is of course important that officials represent the best and the brightest, it is folly to believe that any central planners can be so smart as to know how to allocate scarce resources better than markets.
Hayek’s concept of “the fatal conceit” nails it:
The belief that one person or group, no matter how smart, can know how best to allocate resources is a classic example of what the Nobel Laureate economist F. A. Hayek called “the fatal conceit.”
In Hayek’s view, what enables businesspeople to make good decisions about the allocation of resources is not that they are smarter than other people. Instead, two other factors are key.
First, businesspeople have very detailed knowledge of their particular corners of the world. They know where resources are, where their customers are and what they want, and have the experience of knowing how to deliver it. This is not about being “smarter,” but about having local and contextual knowledge that others don’t have.
Second, entrepreneurs develop this knowledge by making use of the signals provided by prices, profits, and losses. Prices guide entrepreneurial decision-making by enabling them to formulate budgets and estimate the profitability of the various choices they might make.
Profits and losses provide information after the fact about how well they chose. Profits signal them to continue, while losses tell them that resources need to be reallocated. By acting on the basis of that information, each entrepreneur contributes to the overall improved allocation of resources.
The lesson from Hayek is that when the rules are right, markets are collectively much smarter than any individual or group within them. This is the lesson that the Obama administration has utterly missed.
Let us have new financial regulation. Let us have heath-care reform. With both, let us empower markets and reduce the role of command-and-control central authority.
[Chairman Bernanke photo and quote source]
![“I expect there will be some failures” of smaller banks. “Among the largest banks, the capital ratios remain good and I don’t anticipate any serious problems of that sort among the large, internationally active banks that make up a very substantial part of our banking system.”
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, February 2008
Was the Fed Chairman lying or just totally wrong? In either case, should we make the financial system yet more fragile and inflexible by adding to the immense power held by this position?
Btw, have you noticed how often commentators mention that Bernanke is an “expert” on the Great Depression? If I had a dollar for every time I’ve heard that bit, I’d exchange all that paper for gold.
Do we not con ourselves with such talk? It is naturally somehow comforting to believe that our problems will lessen or disappear because some single expert can devise the solution to save us. As with all myths, though, reality differs from the tale.
While it is of course important that officials represent the best and the brightest, it is folly to believe that any central planners can be so smart as to know how to allocate scarce resources better than markets.
Hayek’s concept of “the fatal conceit” nails it:
The belief that one person or group, no matter how smart, can know how best to allocate resources is a classic example of what the Nobel Laureate economist F. A. Hayek called “the fatal conceit.”
In Hayek’s view, what enables businesspeople to make good decisions about the allocation of resources is not that they are smarter than other people. Instead, two other factors are key.
First, businesspeople have very detailed knowledge of their particular corners of the world. They know where resources are, where their customers are and what they want, and have the experience of knowing how to deliver it. This is not about being “smarter,” but about having local and contextual knowledge that others don’t have.
Second, entrepreneurs develop this knowledge by making use of the signals provided by prices, profits, and losses. Prices guide entrepreneurial decision-making by enabling them to formulate budgets and estimate the profitability of the various choices they might make.
Profits and losses provide information after the fact about how well they chose. Profits signal them to continue, while losses tell them that resources need to be reallocated. By acting on the basis of that information, each entrepreneur contributes to the overall improved allocation of resources.
The lesson from Hayek is that when the rules are right, markets are collectively much smarter than any individual or group within them. This is the lesson that the Obama administration has utterly missed.
Let us have new financial regulation. Let us have heath-care reform. With both, let us empower markets and reduce the role of command-and-control central authority.
[Chairman Bernanke photo and quote source]](http://24.media.tumblr.com/Anhohk1saqxgs2o5V4jWzrUio1_r1_500.jpg)

